That should be a good idea, Ilya. At that moment, i'm working on Docker support. When it's done, we can run only Docker hosts, no need to use KVM for hosting system vms.
Cheers, --Tuna Sent from my GT-N7000 On Jun 5, 2014 7:58 AM, "ilya musayev" <ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > We are considering running KVM and LXC on the same host and hopefully > control both through cloudstack. > > I know there are agents involved for each component, i dont know if we can > have a hybrid of LXC+KVM. > > The use case is simple, we would like the end user to pick LXC/Docker for > performance, or KVM instance if he really needed all bells and whistles of > dedicated kernel in fully virtualized environment. > > Is anyone aware why we should not mix 2 workloads on the same host? Is it > possible at this point in time to mix LXC, KVM and CloudStack, i assume the > answer is no, but perhaps there is a hack i can try. > > Thanks > ilya >
