ilya, Let us know how it goes your hybrid of LXC+KVM. I'm interested to know how it's going, I might try that too on the side.
Pierre-Luc Dion Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect 855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101 - - - *CloudOps*420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_ On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu <t...@apache.org> wrote: > That should be a good idea, Ilya. At that moment, i'm working on Docker > support. When it's done, we can run only Docker hosts, no need to use KVM > for hosting system vms. > > Cheers, > --Tuna > > Sent from my GT-N7000 > On Jun 5, 2014 7:58 AM, "ilya musayev" <ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > We are considering running KVM and LXC on the same host and hopefully > > control both through cloudstack. > > > > I know there are agents involved for each component, i dont know if we > can > > have a hybrid of LXC+KVM. > > > > The use case is simple, we would like the end user to pick LXC/Docker for > > performance, or KVM instance if he really needed all bells and whistles > of > > dedicated kernel in fully virtualized environment. > > > > Is anyone aware why we should not mix 2 workloads on the same host? Is it > > possible at this point in time to mix LXC, KVM and CloudStack, i assume > the > > answer is no, but perhaps there is a hack i can try. > > > > Thanks > > ilya > > >
