Hi Daan - I am not sure I get your point here. These changes were put in
as I want them in 4.4.1, but were not critical enough to be put in 4.4.

Thanks,
-Nitin

On 17/07/14 2:58 PM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>sure? I saw that the last few lines where not in the last version.
>
>I'm not confortable with this bit, it has been coming up a few time
>before already looks like some commit on 4.4-forward is trying to
>sneak it's way into the release:
>
>@@ -2439,4 +2474,16 @@
>   CONSTRAINT `fk_lb_healthcheck_policy_details__lb_healthcheck_policy_id`
>FOREIGN KEY 
>`fk_lb_healthcheck_policy_details__lb_healthcheck_policy_id`(`lb_policy_id
>`)
>REFERENCES `load_balancer_healthcheck_policies`(`id`) ON DELETE
>CASCADE
> ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
>
>+ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`snapshot_policy` ADD COLUMN `display` tinyint(1)
>NOT NULL DEFAULT '1' COMMENT 'True if the policy can be displayed to
>the end user';
>+
>+CREATE TABLE `cloud`.`snapshot_policy_details` (
>+  `id` bigint unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
>+  `policy_id` bigint unsigned NOT NULL COMMENT 'snapshot policy id',
>+  `name` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
>+  `value` varchar(1024) NOT NULL,
>+  `display` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1' COMMENT 'True if the
>detail can be displayed to the end user',
>+  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
>+  CONSTRAINT `fk_snapshot_policy_details__snapshot_policy_id` FOREIGN
>KEY `fk_snapshot_policy_details__snapshot_policy_id`(`policy_id`)
>REFERENCES `snapshot_policy`(`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE
>+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
>+
> INSERT INTO `cloud`.`configuration`(category, instance, component,
>name, value, description, default_value) VALUES ('Advanced',
>'DEFAULT', 'management-server', 'vm.password.length', '6', 'Specifies
>the length of a randomly generated password', '6') ON DUPLICATE KEY
>UPDATE category='Advanced';
>
>On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Amogh Vasekar
><amogh.vase...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> Seems good, looks like was an issue with a newline somewhere. But
>>deploydb
>> went fine on 4.4
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amogh
>>
>> On 7/17/14 2:42 PM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Amogh, I couldn't help myself. please have a look at the resulting
>>>setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql
>>>
>>>On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Daan Hoogland
>>><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Amogh Vasekar
>>>> <amogh.vase...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>> c8ca15b95a57a3d79b71c76c913e295f6490f05d
>>>>
>>>> Amogh, it has conflicts. I will have a look at those in the morning
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Daan
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Daan

Reply via email to