They keep coming in with cherry-picks that include this file. I will
remove them.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:22 AM, Nitin Mehta <nitin.me...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi Daan - I am not sure I get your point here. These changes were put in
> as I want them in 4.4.1, but were not critical enough to be put in 4.4.
>
> Thanks,
> -Nitin
>
> On 17/07/14 2:58 PM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>sure? I saw that the last few lines where not in the last version.
>>
>>I'm not confortable with this bit, it has been coming up a few time
>>before already looks like some commit on 4.4-forward is trying to
>>sneak it's way into the release:
>>
>>@@ -2439,4 +2474,16 @@
>> CONSTRAINT `fk_lb_healthcheck_policy_details__lb_healthcheck_policy_id`
>>FOREIGN KEY
>>`fk_lb_healthcheck_policy_details__lb_healthcheck_policy_id`(`lb_policy_id
>>`)
>>REFERENCES `load_balancer_healthcheck_policies`(`id`) ON DELETE
>>CASCADE
>> ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
>>
>>+ALTER TABLE `cloud`.`snapshot_policy` ADD COLUMN `display` tinyint(1)
>>NOT NULL DEFAULT '1' COMMENT 'True if the policy can be displayed to
>>the end user';
>>+
>>+CREATE TABLE `cloud`.`snapshot_policy_details` (
>>+ `id` bigint unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
>>+ `policy_id` bigint unsigned NOT NULL COMMENT 'snapshot policy id',
>>+ `name` varchar(255) NOT NULL,
>>+ `value` varchar(1024) NOT NULL,
>>+ `display` tinyint(1) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1' COMMENT 'True if the
>>detail can be displayed to the end user',
>>+ PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
>>+ CONSTRAINT `fk_snapshot_policy_details__snapshot_policy_id` FOREIGN
>>KEY `fk_snapshot_policy_details__snapshot_policy_id`(`policy_id`)
>>REFERENCES `snapshot_policy`(`id`) ON DELETE CASCADE
>>+) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8;
>>+
>> INSERT INTO `cloud`.`configuration`(category, instance, component,
>>name, value, description, default_value) VALUES ('Advanced',
>>'DEFAULT', 'management-server', 'vm.password.length', '6', 'Specifies
>>the length of a randomly generated password', '6') ON DUPLICATE KEY
>>UPDATE category='Advanced';
>>
>>On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Amogh Vasekar
>><amogh.vase...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> Seems good, looks like was an issue with a newline somewhere. But
>>>deploydb
>>> went fine on 4.4
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Amogh
>>>
>>> On 7/17/14 2:42 PM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Amogh, I couldn't help myself. please have a look at the resulting
>>>>setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql
>>>>
>>>>On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Daan Hoogland
>>>><daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Amogh Vasekar
>>>>> <amogh.vase...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>> c8ca15b95a57a3d79b71c76c913e295f6490f05d
>>>>>
>>>>> Amogh, it has conflicts. I will have a look at those in the morning
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Daan
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Daan
>
--
Daan
