----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25065/#review51585 -----------------------------------------------------------
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25023/ and cloudstack bug 7405 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7405 have updated this format I should probably submit a new patch with the new regexs - Fred Clift On Aug. 26, 2014, 5:07 p.m., Fred Clift wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/25065/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 26, 2014, 5:07 p.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack. > > > Repository: cloudstack-git > > > Description > ------- > > pre-add all RewriteRule entries to metadata htaccess file for system vm > routers- makes automated router maintanince easier... The set is static and > doesn't ever change after the initial provision - it is identical for every > router... While it is probably good to have code that can dynamically add new > lines (opt/cloud/bin/vmdata.py currently does this, starting from the stub in > git now) there is no reason not to have the full static set of rules in the > initial file. We (betterservers.com) have some in-house router-fixing > scripts that would like to re-unpack the tarball and not loose the full > .htaccess file... > > > Diffs > ----- > > systemvm/patches/debian/config/var/www/html/latest/.htaccess 038a4c9 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25065/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > installed cloudstack, set up networks and provisioned a vm - made sure the > router got the same .htaccess file that it would normally get after the first > vm is added to the network > > > Thanks, > > Fred Clift > >
