Hi,

I recently discussed this with Funs as we want this as well. As a first step, 
we could build 6to4 support on the VPC. Everything behind it can then still be 
IPv4 while stuff is reachable over IPv6 as well. 

This is a first step only. In the end we need native support for IPv6 within 
CloudStack as you described. As that is a big project, splitting it up might be 
wise. 

Would this help?

Regards,
Remi

Sent from my iPhone

> On 26 Mar 2015, at 08:41, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> 
> Hi Wido,
> 
> I guess at this particular time what I'd need is just IPv6 supported in 
> Basic/Adv+sg zone. 
> I imagine this would be the easier to do than for a full blown Advanced zone 
> with VPNs, LBs etc.
> 
> Ideally we should have the same amount of support for it as for IPv4: dhcpv6, 
> security groups v6, additional IPs.
> Would merely duplicating the code for IPv4 be a possible way forward?
> 
> Let me know if there is anything else I can be of help/assistance.
> 
> Lucian
> 
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> 
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Wido den Hollander" <w...@widodh.nl>
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, 26 March, 2015 06:55:41
>> Subject: Re: The state of IPv6 support
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>>> On 25-03-15 19:39, Nux! wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Lack of IPv6 support is the number one thing I'm being harassed about my
>>> Cloudstack installs nowadays; concerning specifically VM IPv6 connectivity 
>>> in
>>> Basic and SG zones, but it is a problem in all zones.
>>> 
>>> We've discussed hacks how to get some IPv6 support in the past, but that's
>>> essentially unsupported, unmanaged, uncontrolled, no firewall/sg for it etc.
>>> Has anything changed in the meanwhile?
>> 
>> Nothing in real code yet, but I had some discussions with Rohit and Hugo
>> and Rohit would try to get time to work on this.
>> 
>>> Is anybody working on this, is anybody planning on working on this? Is there
>>> even a very rough estimate for it, something I can tell people, like "you'll
>>> have it within the year" etc?
>> 
>> No, nothing yet, but I do agree that we really need it.
>> 
>>> Is there anything us non-coders can do to help with this feature?
>> 
>> Tell what you want and at best, as technical as possible!
>> 
>> Wido
>> 
>>> Lucian
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>> 
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro

Reply via email to