Marcus, I can't check if the guid has changed, but the upgrade was a normal one done using "yum update" from Rohit's el6 repo.
To make things more confusing, 2 upgrades ended up with duplicated local storage, but my last test has not. I'll do a couple more tests today to see if the issue is consistent. I'll keep an eye on the guids. +1 what you said re bugfix releases. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marcus" <shadow...@gmail.com> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 05:56:55 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 > Nux, do you have any way to tell if the local storage guid in the > agent.properties changed during the upgrade? Was the agent RPM upgraded or > removed/installed? > > Not that this applies here, but I just wanted to mention that as far as > bugfix releases go I'd hope that we are mostly worried about regressions. > In other words, I don't think it makes sense to block a bugfix release just > because it doesn't fix all known bugs, or is missing a pet patch. If there > are no known regressions, and improvements over the previous release, > that's probably a good thing to release. I'd rather that than cut half a > dozen RCs just to ship a few bugfixes. In fact, I'd prefer to see bugfix > releases more often and contain fewer changes. Just my .02 on the process. > On Apr 8, 2015 8:25 AM, "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > >> -1 >> >> After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local >> storage pool registered 2 times. >> >> Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same >> server, the same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 >> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 >> >> > I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete >> > actually works): >> > >> > Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. >> > Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value >> format, >> > or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the >> > field in api cmd class. >> > >> > Is anyone else able to reproduce this? >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts >> >> up for a vote: >> >> >> >> Git Branch and Commit SH: >> >> >> >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 >> >> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 >> >> >> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >> >> location): >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ >> >> >> >> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> >> >> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >> >> >> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >> >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >> >> >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > *Mike Tutkowski* >> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* >> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com >> > o: 303.746.7302 >> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud >> > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
