Who don't we release the 4.4.3 that was voted on? I think bugfix releases should be small and often, there's no reason to wait to roll a new set of fixes if we have a release that fixes bugs and has passed vote, is there?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: > Sure, go right ahead. > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >> To: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> >> Sent: Tuesday, 14 April, 2015 17:17:30 >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 4.4.3 rc > >> btw, closing this vote and probably the next as well as Remi want more >> KVM fixes back ported. >> >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> >>> >>> On 04/09/2015 12:26 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: >>>> Hi Daan, >>>> >>>> If your doing another RC, consider including the fixes to the >>>> kvmheartbeat script. There’s a final PR I just submitted to make it >>>> work reliably. We’ve tested it in our employee cloud and it works >>>> fine. >>>> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Is it in the 4.4 branch already? >>> >>>> Regards, Remi >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09 Apr 2015, at 11:27, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Daan, >>>>> >>>>> "33744ed658bbf29924bf79c0a651f88abcf793f9: appliance: build >>>>> systemvm template for KVM compatible with older qemu" this seems >>>>> important as System VMs will not be able to run on older qemu >>>>> (namely CentOS 6). >>>>> >>>>> Since we've been taking our time with it, I wouldn't mind another >>>>> quick RC, at least release something good. >>>>> >>>>> -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >>>>> >>>>> Nux! www.nux.ro >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> To: "dev" >>>>>> <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 >>>>>> 09:33:07 Subject: [DISCUSS] 4.4.3 rc >>>>> >>>>>> H, >>>>>> >>>>>> I made a 4.4.3 rc a couple of weeks ago and it has tachnically >>>>>> enough votes to be released atm. There where some fixes in the >>>>>> last two weeks that are not in there however and it is no >>>>>> trouble to create a new rc. Should I/Can I? Or do we all feel >>>>>> the present state should be released: >>>>>> >>>>>> 33744ed658bbf29924bf79c0a651f88abcf793f9: appliance: build >>>>>> systemvm template for KVM compatible with older qemu >>>>>> 244c361b50c7de8b7b4299e8aabcad01efc12e35: appliance: remove any >>>>>> stale raw.img file 9a730d469c7d0baa51034761934791536260396e: >>>>>> CLOUDSTACK-6353: Fix list to have correct LB IP for each rule >>>>>> a79fd8816e1fb91f2df78332380f23ea47463481: Add CONTRIBUTING >>>>>> instructions >>>>>> >>>>>> These don't seem like heavy weighing issues but I still want to >>>>>> give opportunity to champion for any of them. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Daan >>>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v1 >>> >>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVJlvOAAoJEAGbWC3bPspCKiAP+QEZEZ0ulBKDP5xT9bBOIRy4 >>> sJ8S6r2fAKP9/d1Y2uwLwAGVdehIAG9uEzxQI7C2ICpokvm2tZCzyHuRlpA18Xkb >>> 3CEbk84SUFiq+riXmr9U0P8A7ukCEAwu6jpZVdwF3cjqPm1racNdzJRrAnNoOS8y >>> TyK+5cJC76KQH4SbYgaOFB4qRZC5pUE3SmwwtDUwY6BBuQcgr6j3TBNHI+kX8ylk >>> h6BpC7tzv0O+MoF9N7y09ITU5ViInbcIwtxAtPc7HEr58md4TnIkJegudPBvDV1Y >>> 90HtQ4jfzTT7q3gQ5aCd0ezp+xbwCxAM+3bsFu6T3z9xEMj6cADOqxSDfxwGcvzT >>> 1mnvRqtuEU2YRxhHm7RCNQilnh5PVrEr175jPOiNTo5srueEQp5BMBWPaQPm4uBK >>> ei0wm4n0Igk6Qp43HbNRDYX9A28gMxtILf1cTavrIIzZVJIMW5FLpR076eDx8UZn >>> tSQS3maHRZdOKAQMGjdUTsfic20WvwTYk8s6k4w4559TV9Wvx6zOFff1NociuFx/ >>> Zww4RoAEzgo6xCyz/BeLMU9W2YnY70clt9YnpLqRLsghWmTXuLmjHwZLez4zYOaY >>> dKjdcorFgUQt7qngV6FTwYLds2Ka+cTYkIPGJ4ivShQHa8hItMcFStyu/VFtfUY2 >>> v7nLvATOEsE96hJqFw0O >>> =qcKu >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> >> -- >> Daan
