the first one was ignored. since then we had reports about issues. I
don't generally care except for the nil-database-upgrade code we need
to write.

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Who don't we release the 4.4.3 that was voted on? I think bugfix
> releases should be small and often, there's no reason to wait to roll
> a new set of fixes if we have a release that fixes bugs and has passed
> vote, is there?
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>> Sure, go right ahead.
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>>> To: "dev" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 14 April, 2015 17:17:30
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 4.4.3 rc
>>
>>> btw, closing this vote and probably the next as well as Remi want more
>>> KVM fixes back ported.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 04/09/2015 12:26 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
>>>>> Hi Daan,
>>>>>
>>>>> If your doing another RC, consider including the fixes to the
>>>>> kvmheartbeat script. There’s a final PR I just submitted to make it
>>>>> work reliably. We’ve tested it in our employee cloud and it works
>>>>> fine.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Is it in the 4.4 branch already?
>>>>
>>>>> Regards, Remi
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09 Apr 2015, at 11:27, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Daan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "33744ed658bbf29924bf79c0a651f88abcf793f9: appliance: build
>>>>>> systemvm template for KVM compatible with older qemu" this seems
>>>>>> important as System VMs will not be able to run on older qemu
>>>>>> (namely CentOS 6).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since we've been taking our time with it, I wouldn't mind another
>>>>>> quick RC, at least release something good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nux! www.nux.ro
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> From: "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> To: "dev"
>>>>>>> <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015
>>>>>>> 09:33:07 Subject: [DISCUSS] 4.4.3 rc
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> H,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I made a 4.4.3 rc a couple of weeks ago and it has tachnically
>>>>>>> enough votes to be released atm. There where some fixes in the
>>>>>>> last two weeks that are not in there however and it is no
>>>>>>> trouble to create a new rc. Should I/Can I? Or do we all feel
>>>>>>> the present state should be released:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 33744ed658bbf29924bf79c0a651f88abcf793f9: appliance: build
>>>>>>> systemvm template for KVM compatible with older qemu
>>>>>>> 244c361b50c7de8b7b4299e8aabcad01efc12e35: appliance: remove any
>>>>>>> stale raw.img file 9a730d469c7d0baa51034761934791536260396e:
>>>>>>> CLOUDSTACK-6353: Fix list to have correct LB IP for each rule
>>>>>>> a79fd8816e1fb91f2df78332380f23ea47463481: Add CONTRIBUTING
>>>>>>> instructions
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> These don't seem like heavy weighing issues but I still want to
>>>>>>> give opportunity to champion for any of them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- Daan
>>>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>>>
>>>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVJlvOAAoJEAGbWC3bPspCKiAP+QEZEZ0ulBKDP5xT9bBOIRy4
>>>> sJ8S6r2fAKP9/d1Y2uwLwAGVdehIAG9uEzxQI7C2ICpokvm2tZCzyHuRlpA18Xkb
>>>> 3CEbk84SUFiq+riXmr9U0P8A7ukCEAwu6jpZVdwF3cjqPm1racNdzJRrAnNoOS8y
>>>> TyK+5cJC76KQH4SbYgaOFB4qRZC5pUE3SmwwtDUwY6BBuQcgr6j3TBNHI+kX8ylk
>>>> h6BpC7tzv0O+MoF9N7y09ITU5ViInbcIwtxAtPc7HEr58md4TnIkJegudPBvDV1Y
>>>> 90HtQ4jfzTT7q3gQ5aCd0ezp+xbwCxAM+3bsFu6T3z9xEMj6cADOqxSDfxwGcvzT
>>>> 1mnvRqtuEU2YRxhHm7RCNQilnh5PVrEr175jPOiNTo5srueEQp5BMBWPaQPm4uBK
>>>> ei0wm4n0Igk6Qp43HbNRDYX9A28gMxtILf1cTavrIIzZVJIMW5FLpR076eDx8UZn
>>>> tSQS3maHRZdOKAQMGjdUTsfic20WvwTYk8s6k4w4559TV9Wvx6zOFff1NociuFx/
>>>> Zww4RoAEzgo6xCyz/BeLMU9W2YnY70clt9YnpLqRLsghWmTXuLmjHwZLez4zYOaY
>>>> dKjdcorFgUQt7qngV6FTwYLds2Ka+cTYkIPGJ4ivShQHa8hItMcFStyu/VFtfUY2
>>>> v7nLvATOEsE96hJqFw0O
>>>> =qcKu
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daan



-- 
Daan

Reply via email to