On 27-07-15 15:36, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > aws is still metioned in our pom.xml. It can be removed, afaics. > > Now that aws compatibility is taken care of in a proxy, we should not > be depending on the sdk anymore or is there some other stuff that > still needs it? >
Yes, the S3 Secondary Storage uses the AWS SDK. Wido
