yes :( found it in my latest experiment :) On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > > > On 27-07-15 15:36, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> H, >> >> aws is still metioned in our pom.xml. It can be removed, afaics. >> >> Now that aws compatibility is taken care of in a proxy, we should not >> be depending on the sdk anymore or is there some other stuff that >> still needs it? >> > > Yes, the S3 Secondary Storage uses the AWS SDK. > > Wido >
-- Daan
