On 25-10-15 10:52, Milamber wrote: > > > On 25/10/2015 07:05, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> Folks, >> >> We have been using GitHub for PR now for a while, it seems to work >> despite the fact that we still have to get used to the workflow. >> We lack some privileges on the mirror to be able to use labels etc. >> >> I would also be in favor of using Issues and why not the Wiki. >> Basically I personally would be in favor of a 100% move to GitHub. >> >> There is some core discussions happening with ASF members about what >> that means for the very nature of an ASF project. >> >> But I am curious, >> >> What do you think about moving our source repo to GitHub (instead of >> it being a mirror) and start using the other features of github ? > > If we do abstract all issues around a infra for a Open Source project > inside/provide a business company. (Free service = you are the product, > end of free service depends of business decision, etc.) , this could be > a good thing to move to Github for their functionalities. > > But, I thinks that would be better to keep the control of the source > code repo. This is the core of your work. >
Agree. I love Github and it works great, but make it THE primary source for the source code and go away from ASF? Well, I'm not sure. True, Git is distributed and that's cool, but I think we should make sure that as a project we aren't depended on Github. Wido > If we need to use the labels, and others github behaviors, why not > create a new ASF service provided by GitLab open source project ? > > Milamber > > > >> >> -Sebastien >
