Will you be able to create a Template from a StorageSnapshot? If yes, will the template be stored in the secondary storage like normal templates or will that be handled somehow on the vendor side?
*Will STEVENS* Lead Developer *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Syed Mushtaq <syed1.mush...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Will!!! > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> > wrote: > >> I explicitly linked the Design Spec in the Jira ticket because it was not >> clear in the 'mention' section because it shows as a page 'you do not have >> permission to'. >> >> *Will STEVENS* >> Lead Developer >> >> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts >> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 >> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ >> >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Syed Ahmed <sah...@cloudops.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Design Spec: >>> >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/StorageSnapshot++API >>> >>> Jira Ticket >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9278 >>> >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> We plan to propose a new set of APIs to do snapshots on managed storage >>> backends like SolidFire. Snapshots on current managed storage stay on the >>> device which is contrary to what CloudStack calls snpshots. But taking >>> snapshots >>> on storage and keeping it there has its own advantages and we would >>> ideally like >>> to have both ways of doing snapshots. This proposal adds 4 new APIs to >>> create snapshots on backend storage. >>> >>> What do you guys think of this feature? I would love to have some >>> feedback. I am working on making the design spec more concrete but wanted >>> to have >>> a high level feedback first before starting to work on it. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Syed >>> >>> >> >
