+1 (maybe put/fork upr in there to prevent any cleaning from happening? ;) On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes exactly. I don't think we should delete the org, just the repo. I think > the usage of that org is out of scope for this conversation and will likely > change based on this outcome. I think we should put that org on ice for the > time being. > On Mar 19, 2016 9:59 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I see you found the vote thread. Thanks for voting. :) > > > > > > For now I think it is best that we try to avoid using the cloudstack > org > > > for anything in order to mitigate confusion and try to get everyone on > > the > > > same page. We are charting new territory here, so removing as many > > > unnecessary distractions and causes for cloudy perception of what we > are > > > trying to achieve is paramount IMO. > > > > > of course > > > > > > > > > > > > I personally think we should remove the cloudstack/cloudstack repo at > > this > > > point as I think it is more of a liability in this process than > anything. > > > > > yes, but only the repository and not the organisation > > > > > -- Daan
