Hey Will, I was referring to the need to add:
db.cloud.driver=jdbc:mysql db.usage.driver=jdbc:mysql db.simulator.driver=jdbc:mysql to db.properties when upgrading. Asking admins to add this manually won’t give the impression of a ‘well-packaged’ product. And I suspect will end up like the manually encrypting vmware passwords step, which was required for one upgrade, and now clients constantly ask us if they need to repeat the step, because its carried forward to every upgrade note. Kind regards, Paul Angus From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Will Stevens Sent: 11 July 2016 14:10 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1 Hi Paul, Can you review the discussion here to see if it clears anything up: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-215479369 Can you help me understand what you are expecting the functionality to be and what you are experiencing? Thanks, Will STEVENS Lead Developer CloudOps | Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy | Montreal | Quebec | H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com<http://cloudops.com/> | tw @CloudOps_ On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: Guys, Is it not possible to add the additional entries into db.properties when CloudStack is upgrading rather than manually? If it is possible, then manually intervention is a -1 in my book. Sure it's not a big fix required - but it's still required for CloudStack to work in a slick manner. We're trying to improve the user experience. Kind regards, Paul Angus paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue paul.an...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue -----Original Message----- From: Milamber [mailto:milam...@apache.org<mailto:milam...@apache.org>] Sent: 10 July 2016 12:06 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC1 Hello, My vote +1 (binding) Tests are passed on a virtual topology of servers (CS over CS) (1mgr+2nodes+1nfs) : 1/ Fresh install of 4.9.0RC1 (adv net) on Ubuntu 14.04.4 + KVM + NFS : OK Some standard tests with success (create vm, migration, HA, create networks, create user, create ssh key, destroy vm, register template, create snapshot, restore snapshot, create template, ip association, ip release, static nat, firewall rule) Some tests with cloudstack ansible module with sucess too (create network, register templates, create vm, ip, firewall rule) 2/ Test upgrade from 4.7.1 to 4.9.0RC1 : OK with the same remarks than Wido (need to add JDBC driver type in db.properties) 3/ Tests of all localizations of Web UI of 4.9RC1 : Localization works well except Spanish: the Web UI won't display due of 2 localization strings with a escaped quote (from Transifex) 'label.number.of.system.vms': 'Número de VM\\'s del Systema', 'label.vm.state': 'Estado de VM\\'s', Fixed in the PR1583 https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583 Perhaps add in the Release notes this 2 issues (jdbc type & spanish l10n) Thanks to the RM. Milamber On 06/07/2016 20:52, Will Stevens wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h= > refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160706T1546 > Commit: 643f75aa9150156b1fb05f339a338614fc7ad3fb > > I will be updating the Release Notes with the changes in this release > tomorrow. If the RC changes, I can adapt the release notes after. > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.9.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using CB818F64): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Thanks, > > Will >
