So, should we move to other thread to discuss and vote its removal or disable its plugin build?
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com > wrote: > Well, if Midokura is not willing to put in effort, ... Not sure what to > put on the dots. > > On 14/03/17 15:08, "Simon Weller" <swel...@ena.com> wrote: > > We took a look at testing it in the lab back in early 2016 and > Midokura told us that it was a bad idea, probably wouldn't work and we > should just switch to openstack. > > > - Si > > ________________________________ > From: Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 3:28 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Rafael Weingärtner > <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I got a reply from Midonet community; they said that midonet-client > was > > incorporated by midonet-cluster ( > > https://github.com/midonet/midonet/tree/staging/v5.4/midonet-cluster > ). > [https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/9136532?v=3&s=400]<https:// > github.com/midonet/midonet/tree/staging/v5.4/midonet-cluster> > > midonet/midonet<https://github.com/midonet/midonet/ > tree/staging/v5.4/midonet-cluster> > github.com > midonet - MidoNet is an Open Source network virtualization system for > Openstack clouds > > > > > > > > > So, if anyone wants to invest energy on this, it might be a good > idea to > > upgrade the dependency. Moreover, I start to question the > compatibility of > > the current client we are using, with the mido-net server side that > might > > be deployed by users. Will this partial integration that we have > work? > > > Just as important to ask: "Has it ever worked?" > Do we know anyone who use, or have used, this integration? > > -- > Erik > > > > daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue > > > > -- Rafael Weingärtner
