I think removing the plugin build is friendly to the daring and won’t hinder 
the ignorant. Good call. However; less code always gets my vote as well. 
Conclusion I’m +/- 0 on this.

On 14/03/17 19:43, "Rafael Weingärtner" <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:

    So, should we move to other thread to discuss and vote its removal or
    disable its plugin build?
    
    On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
    > wrote:
    
    > Well, if Midokura is not willing to put in effort, ... Not sure what to
    > put on the dots.
    >
    > On 14/03/17 15:08, "Simon Weller" <swel...@ena.com> wrote:
    >
    >     We took a look at testing it in the lab back in early 2016  and
    > Midokura told us that it was a bad idea, probably wouldn't work and we
    > should just switch to openstack.
    >
    >
    >     - Si
    >
    >     ________________________________
    >     From: Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com>
    >     Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 3:28 AM
    >     To: dev
    >     Subject: Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict
    >
    >     On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Rafael Weingärtner
    >     <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
    >     > I got a reply from Midonet community; they said that midonet-client
    > was
    >     > incorporated by midonet-cluster (
    >     > https://github.com/midonet/midonet/tree/staging/v5.4/midonet-cluster
    > ).
    >     [https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/9136532?v=3&s=400]<https://
    > github.com/midonet/midonet/tree/staging/v5.4/midonet-cluster>
    >
    >     midonet/midonet<https://github.com/midonet/midonet/
    > tree/staging/v5.4/midonet-cluster>
    >     github.com
    >     midonet - MidoNet is an Open Source network virtualization system for
    > Openstack clouds
    >
    >
    >
    >     >
    >     >
    >     > So, if anyone wants to invest energy on this, it might be a good
    > idea to
    >     > upgrade the dependency. Moreover, I start to question the
    > compatibility of
    >     > the current client we are using, with the mido-net server side that
    > might
    >     > be deployed by users. Will this partial integration that we have
    > work?
    >
    >
    >     Just as important to ask: "Has it ever worked?"
    >     Do we know anyone who use, or have used, this integration?
    >
    >     --
    >     Erik
    >
    >
    >
    > daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com
    > www.shapeblue.com
    > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
    > @shapeblue
    >
    >
    >
    >
    
    
    -- 
    Rafael Weingärtner
    


daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Reply via email to