Igor, I remember your PR and think it is fine. It can also be argued that
it needs to go in as a security feature. For an RM it is unthinkably late,
but fortunately it is very small. I will however -1 it if it leads to a
plethora of last minute PRs to include.

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Voloshanenko Igor <
igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Guys, can we please include https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2389
> into 4.11
> PR very small and updates will be published in next few hours.
>
> As we have this for a while in production for 4.8 branch.
>
> 2018-01-08 11:15 GMT+02:00 Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com>:
>
> > +1 Daan
> >
> >
> > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 8 Jan 2018, at 10:47, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Rohit, Ivan,
> > >
> > > I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone can still
> go
> > > in as long as active work on them continues. I have not looked at
> Ivan's
> > > PRs yet but can see they were entered in december and he is actively
> > > working on it so why not include those in the milestone. A bigger
> concern
> > > is that some of the remaining PRs in that milestone are potentially
> > > conflicting. So we feature freeze now and work only to get the set list
> > in
> > > (and blockers).
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev <
> > kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Rohit, Devs,
> > >>
> > >> just consider adding:
> > >>
> > >> CLOUDSTACK-10188 / https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2362
> > [resouce
> > >> accounting blocker bug]
> > >> CLOUDSTACK-10170 / https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2350
> > >> [security
> > >> fix, enchancement]
> > >>
> > >> They are ready (we think so) for some time, but *no final review* yet.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2018-01-08 14:47 GMT+07:00 Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>:
> > >>
> > >>> All,
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> As per the previously shared schedule [1], by EOD today (8 Jan 2018)
> we
> > >>> would freeze master after which we'll only accept critical/blocker
> > fixes,
> > >>> stabilize master and start a voting thread on 4.11 RC1 (est. by 15
> Jan
> > >>> 2018).
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I wanted to gather consensus if this is acceptable to everyone as
> there
> > >>> are still few outstanding feature PRs that I understand authors have
> > >> worked
> > >>> hard to get them in.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Please share your thoughts, comments.  If you're the author of such
> an
> > >>> existing PR, please work with us, address outstanding issues.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> In case of no objections, it will be assumed that the plan is
> > acceptable
> > >>> to everyone. Thanks.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/mszlluye35acvn2j
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> - Rohit
> > >>>
> > >>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > >>> www.shapeblue.com
> > >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > >>> @shapeblue
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> > >> Bitworks Software, Ltd.
> > >> Cell: +7-923-414-1515
> > >> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daan
> >
> >
>



-- 
Daan

Reply via email to