Updates posted to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2389
Can you please review?

2018-01-08 11:57 GMT+02:00 Voloshanenko Igor <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com>:

> Sure. Got it.
>
> Will post update soon
>
> 2018-01-08 11:38 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Igor, I remember your PR and think it is fine. It can also be argued that
>> it needs to go in as a security feature. For an RM it is unthinkably late,
>> but fortunately it is very small. I will however -1 it if it leads to a
>> plethora of last minute PRs to include.
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Voloshanenko Igor <
>> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Guys, can we please include https://github.com/apache/clou
>> dstack/pull/2389
>> > into 4.11
>> > PR very small and updates will be published in next few hours.
>> >
>> > As we have this for a while in production for 4.8 branch.
>> >
>> > 2018-01-08 11:15 GMT+02:00 Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
>> >:
>> >
>> > > +1 Daan
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
>> > > www.shapeblue.com
>> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>> > > @shapeblue
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > On 8 Jan 2018, at 10:47, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Rohit, Ivan,
>> > > >
>> > > > I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone can
>> still
>> > go
>> > > > in as long as active work on them continues. I have not looked at
>> > Ivan's
>> > > > PRs yet but can see they were entered in december and he is actively
>> > > > working on it so why not include those in the milestone. A bigger
>> > concern
>> > > > is that some of the remaining PRs in that milestone are potentially
>> > > > conflicting. So we feature freeze now and work only to get the set
>> list
>> > > in
>> > > > (and blockers).
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev <
>> > > kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Rohit, Devs,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> just consider adding:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> CLOUDSTACK-10188 / https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2362
>> > > [resouce
>> > > >> accounting blocker bug]
>> > > >> CLOUDSTACK-10170 / https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2350
>> > > >> [security
>> > > >> fix, enchancement]
>> > > >>
>> > > >> They are ready (we think so) for some time, but *no final review*
>> yet.
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2018-01-08 14:47 GMT+07:00 Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> >:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> All,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> As per the previously shared schedule [1], by EOD today (8 Jan
>> 2018)
>> > we
>> > > >>> would freeze master after which we'll only accept critical/blocker
>> > > fixes,
>> > > >>> stabilize master and start a voting thread on 4.11 RC1 (est. by 15
>> > Jan
>> > > >>> 2018).
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> I wanted to gather consensus if this is acceptable to everyone as
>> > there
>> > > >>> are still few outstanding feature PRs that I understand authors
>> have
>> > > >> worked
>> > > >>> hard to get them in.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Please share your thoughts, comments.  If you're the author of
>> such
>> > an
>> > > >>> existing PR, please work with us, address outstanding issues.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> In case of no objections, it will be assumed that the plan is
>> > > acceptable
>> > > >>> to everyone. Thanks.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/mszlluye35acvn2j
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> - Rohit
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> > > >>> www.shapeblue.com
>> > > >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>> > > >>> @shapeblue
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --
>> > > >> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
>> > > >> Bitworks Software, Ltd.
>> > > >> Cell: +7-923-414-1515
>> > > >> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Daan
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daan
>>
>
>

Reply via email to