Feel free to do so, Sven. I'm not aware that the initial proposal got to confluence, but it should be added there if it did.
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, 22:33 Sven Vogel, <s.vo...@ewerk.com> wrote: > Should we add this to the confluence? > > > __ > > Sven Vogel > Teamlead Platform > > EWERK DIGITAL GmbH > Brühl 24, D-04109 Leipzig > P +49 341 42649 - 99 > F +49 341 42649 - 98 > s.vo...@ewerk.com > www.ewerk.com > > Geschäftsführer: > Dr. Erik Wende, Hendrik Schubert, Frank Richter > Registergericht: Leipzig HRB 9065 > > Zertifiziert nach: > ISO/IEC 27001:2013 > DIN EN ISO 9001:2015 > DIN ISO/IEC 20000-1:2011 > > EWERK-Blog | LinkedIn | Xing | Twitter | Facebook > > Auskünfte und Angebote per Mail sind freibleibend und unverbindlich. > > Disclaimer Privacy: > Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) ist > vertraulich und nur für den Empfänger bestimmt. Sollten Sie nicht der > bestimmungsgemäße Empfänger sein, ist Ihnen jegliche Offenlegung, > Vervielfältigung, Weitergabe oder Nutzung des Inhalts untersagt. Bitte > informieren Sie in diesem Fall unverzüglich den Absender und löschen Sie > die E-Mail (einschließlich etwaiger beigefügter Dateien) von Ihrem System. > Vielen Dank. > > The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential > and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of > this e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents > is strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately > and then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. Thank you. > > Am 14.02.2020 um 19:45 schrieb Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>: > > > > Thanks all for the swift responses. Let's just start doing this. No need > > for a vote until someone starts a discussion on the subject. Agree? > > > >> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, 17:04 Rohit Yadav, <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > >> > >> +1 (better than changing the PR subject, putting wip-labels or [WIP]) > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Rohit Yadav > >> > >> Software Architect, ShapeBlue > >> https://www.shapeblue.com > >> > >> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > >> www.shapeblue.com > >> @shapeblue > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> *From:* Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > >> *Sent:* Friday, February 14, 2020 17:33 > >> *To:* dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > >> *Subject:* [DISCUSS]/[PROPOSAL] draft PRs > >> > >> devs, I thought I had already sent a mail about this but i cannot find > it. > >> I'm sure i had mentioned it somewhere (probably on github). > >> this is a follow up on [1] and hopefully you'll agree, a slight > >> improvement. > >> > >> here it comes: > >> > >> At the moment we are creating PRs with a [WIP] or [DO NOT MERGE] tag in > the > >> title. This title stands the chance of being merged once we agree the > PR is > >> ready for merge. It also clutters the title. > >> > >> Github has introduced a nice feature a while ago; draft PR. When > creating a > >> PR you can opt not to open it for merge but as draft. Choose a button > left > >> of the "Create pull request" button, marked "Create draft PR". It will > be a > >> full PR with all CI and discussion possibilities open. The only > difference > >> is the merge button being disabled. One will than have to make/mark it > >> "ready for merge" before it *can* be merged. > >> > >> [1] > >> > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f3f0988907f85bfc2cfcb0fbcde831037f9b1cb017e94bcdddd68932%40%3Cdev.cloudstack.apache.org%3E > >> please shoot any comments you may have back at me, > >> thanks > >> > >> -- > >> Daan > >> >
