Geoff Howard wrote:

Christopher Oliver wrote:

Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

<snip>


Geoff suggested couple of places:

This seems to be a good solution too, as long as it's not once per application. It seems it would need to be on <map:flow> or <map:call>?


I think map:flow is appropriate.


+0 to turning on/off session creation in <map:flow>.

-1 to having "request" or "context" scope.


Again, this would seem fine to me. I'm not sure I totally understand the problem with context scope (though request I think I understand). What potential for abuse or error do you see?

Geoff

If you allow modification of global variables, then multiple users would be able to modify the same variables. If not, then you don't need any dynamic storage at all.

Chris


Reply via email to