Tony Collen dijo: > Antonio Gallardo wrote: >> Tony Collen dijo: >> >>>Well, call me a luddite but I'm not a huge fan of the DHTML... what's >>> wrong with slapping help info in an alt tag? >> >> >> It depends, DHTML with Javascript helps to make some validations for >> users before send the page back to the server. DHTML allow to add some >> nice features like interactives drop down menus and popup contextual >> help. This kind of interaction is what a user has in a traditional fat >> client. >> >> I think there is no way back. Of course if we dont want, we can not >> use DHTML at all. But this is up to us. Blocking a feature is not the >> answer. In that case a <wd:help> tag must exist for every field and >> maybe at form level. >> >> Contextual help in a web application is a MUST. This is why I think >> woody must have a optional tag help. If you want to use it or not ot >> depedends of the user. The form how we will render it in HTML or WML >> depends of us. >> >> I would suggest to add <wd:help>. Also JXForms already has it. > > > erp, what I meant to say was misunderstood.
No, I already uderstand you. :) What I tried to explain is what you resumed below. > > I'm all for a "help" tag, I'm just not for hardcoding how it ends up > appearing (DHTML). The last transformation woody2html depend of us. This can be easily modificable. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.
