On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 18:31, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Bruno Dumon wrote: > > >On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 17:23, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > > <snip/> > > >>As for disposal, the TreeProcessor maintains a list of all Disposable > >>nodes created by the builders that are disposed when the sitemap itself > >>is disposed (BTW, thanks Carsten for finding that nodes should be > >>disposed in reverse order !) > >> > >> > > > >The problem I saw with disposal was related to form-instances (more the > >when than the how), but now I realize it's probably only the *Definition > >objects that would need to become components, no? > > > > > > Do you mean that form instances can be stored in the session or in a > continuation, thus having a non-predictible disposal time ?
Yes. The current flow examples already work in this way. > You are > probably right. This means instances should delegate all their > component-related behaviour to their definition. I was bit surprised at > first by the backwards relation from the instance to its definition, but > it may make sense after all for this purpose. Yeah, it's full of suprises. Be prepared. -- Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
