Re: [RT] Revisiting Woody's form definition

[Sylvain Wallez]

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

Sylvain Wallez wrote:
 

I think you missed the real meaning of my post : since validators are 
pluggable, you can write you own and do whatever you want in it !

Cocoon should provide the most useful and generic implementations, but 
it does not lock with the provides implementations.
   

Yupp! Are these validators etc. real avalon components?
 

Validators currently exist only for datatypes, and not yet for bindings 
(this is on my todo list).

Currently, only ValidatorBuilders are components and also on my todo 
list is applying to Woody the same pattern that allows TreeProcessor 
nodes to be components (validators must be able to access the object 
model, sources and any other component).

Sylvain

--
Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain           http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
Orixo, the opensource XML business alliance  -  http://www.orixo.com