On Thursday, Sep 18, 2003, at 05:12 Europe/Rome, Geoff Howard wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:All right, what the hell, you are right, let's move out of the "impasse".
I thought we'd come to some agreement that no option was without problems but that splitting to a separate cocoon-2.2 module was probably the least bad option.
Yes, this seems to be the consensus.
let's do a quick poll: who would be absolutely against using Subversion for the Cocoon 2.2 tree (granted that we can safely import the existing CVS tree into it)?
state your reasons and try to be as less inertial and defensive on your status quo as possible.
Did Niclas' comment about the unreleased status kill this?
Yes, it did. We will consider moving to Subversion only when they release a public final version that will not move under our feet. It's a defensive attitude, admittedly, but we don't want any more problems.
-- Stefano.
