Stefano Mazzocchi dijo: > > On Saturday, Oct 11, 2003, at 17:33 Europe/Rome, Antonio Gallardo wrote: > >> Stefano Mazzocchi dijo: >>> a repository is just like a database: editing a database by direct >>> SQL injection is silly. Today it doesn't look silly because >>> repositories are *much* less functional than a database, but when you >>> have a *serious* repository (for example, one that can extract >>> properties from >>> an image and provide an RDF representation for it), editing it *by >>> hand* would be silly. >> >> Is a good idea to use some a XML database to store the content? I >> guess we >> are taking about an application outside the cvs, right? If this is >> correct >> a good candidate can be Xindice: http://xml.apache.org/xindice/ :) > > no, too weak as a contract. > > [believe me I searched for the perfect repository years. JSR 170 is > what we need, nothing more nothing less]
Yep. You are "the master" here. This was just a suggestion. I am not a pro in CMS at all. But I am trying to learn. I read the all the mails and sometimes fire a comment here and there :-D > note: the repository implementation might use xindice internally, like > a store, but there is a loooong way to go there. This was I thought, the database as the "back office". :) > for now, the best option, IMO, is to stick to simple webdav. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
