Hi: 2 recently threads make me think about the topic of the thread. AFAIK Cocoon does not try to stick on any product but Jetty performs better than Tomcat:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-users&m=107213647015861&w=2 another fact is Saxon better than Xalan: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-users&m=107243671502545&w=2 JETTY: ====== The license is compatible with Apache since we are already distributing a small version of jetty inside Cocoon. SAXON: ====== Saxon is Mozilla Public License 1.0. It is an OSI aproved license too. But I am not sure if it is compatible with ASF license: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mozilla1.0.php Question: If the MPL 1.0 is ASF compatible then can we include Saxon as part of Cocoon? AFAIK it will deliver better performance that for sure all the users will welcome. I understand that Cocoon project is not sticking on any 3rd party product from another project, but I think is very important enhance the user experience by default to the best products we can use in each area. This is why I made a similar question somedays ago about the default XSP compiler: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=107194493701061&w=2 I appreaciate the replies from Vadim and Stefano about my request of changing the XSP compiler topic. They helps me understand that eclipse compiler was the currently best choice right now. Please note I am not requesting to remove Xalan nor close the door to Xalan. I am just requesting to include Saxon since it performs better and seems to have less bugs. WDYT? Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
