Christopher Oliver wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Another question: do we want to cleanup flow/woody a bit and remove
deprecated files/classes, such as non-FOM flow and woody.js?
+1
Better yet, let's start VOTE thread. Please cast your vote on following:
1) Remove woody.js
[ ]
2) Remove JSCocoon, JSWebContinuation, JSLog, JavaScriptInterpreter,
JavaScriptFlow, JSGlobal, system.js
[ ]
3) Move JSCocoon, JSWebContinuation, JSLog, JavaScriptInterpreter,
JavaScriptFlow, JSGlobal, system.js to the deprecated block
[ ]
Vadim
- Re: Managing Continuation Trees Christopher Oliver
- Re: Managing Continuation Trees Sylvain Wallez
- Re: Managing Continuation Trees Christopher Oliver
- Re: Managing Continuation Trees Sylvain Wallez
- Re: Managing Continuation Trees Vadim Gritsenko
- Re: Managing Continuation Trees Christopher Oliver
- Re: Managing Continuation Trees Vadim Gritsenko
- Re: Managing Continuation Trees Sylvain Wallez
- Re: Managing Continuation Trees Christopher Oliver
- Re: Managing Continuation Trees Vadim Gritsenko
- Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow Vadim Gritsenko
- Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow Sylvain Wallez
- Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow Antonio Gallardo
- RE: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow Reinhard Poetz
- Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow Joerg Heinicke
- Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow Jorg Heymans
- Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow Joerg Heinicke
- Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow Jorg Heymans
- Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow Joerg Heinicke
- Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow Geoff Howard
- Re: [VOTE] Remove woody.js, non-FOM flow Ugo Cei