I'll admit that I didn't do the work evaluating Woody. My colleague indicated he had problems figuring out how to get Woody bindings to work without flow. If there are samples of that let me know and I'll have him look at it again.
Thanks, Ralph -----Original Message----- From: Steven Noels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 12:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [proposal] Cleaning up our component library On Jan 28, 2004, at 8:43 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > We'd love to use Woody (aka Cocoon Forms), but if it can be used > without > FlowScript it isn't obvious. Woody and FlowScript should be totally independent from each other. Much of the fun stuff lately has been done in the JS utility library, but Woody itself doesn't require FlowScript - there's examples of using Woody with Actions at http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/java/org/ apache/cocoon/woody/acting/ and http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/cocoon-2.1/src/blocks/woody/java/org/ apache/cocoon/woody/samples/ </Steven>
