I'm not against considering 1.4 for 2.2, but please have in mind
that we have to maintain 2.1.x first which is JDK 1.3 based and
we need a replacement for Jisp there.

Carsten 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorg Heymans
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 9:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Stream vs Mapped IO (was Re: [VOTE] - Entry level 
> JSDK 1.4 in Cocoon 2.2)
> 
> Has anyone else read Bruce Eckel's "Thinking in Java" ?
> 
> <quote> (chapter 12)
> Although the performance of "old" stream I/O has been 
> improved by implementing it with nio, mapped file access 
> tends to be dramatically faster.
> </quote>
> 
> So by switching to 1.4 and *not* using NIO you're likely to 
> get a speed bump already.
> 
> However switching to mapped file access (as was suggested 
> before using memory mapped files) from traditional stream IO 
> would gain the most significant increase.
> 
> <quote>
> Stream Write: 1719
> Mapped Write: 359
> Stream Read: 750
> Mapped Read: 125
> Stream Read/Write: 5188
> Mapped Read/Write: 16
> </quote>
> 
> I am getting similar results over various runs. The test 
> program is attached (needs the test harness classes to run, 
> but you can see what he's doing)
> 
> The third edition including code samples is freely available 
> from http://mindview.net/Books/DownloadSites
> 
> I hope this helps making the decision 1.4 vs 1.3. I also 
> started a poll on the userlist to get a feeling of what the 
> installed userbase is using at the moment. I'll gather some 
> stats and report back.
> 
> 
> Regards
> Jorg
> 
> Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> 
> > Hi:
> > 
> > Many was talked about this topic. I think it not need a 
> large explanation:
> > 
> > The idea is to set JSDK 1.4 as the minimum supported JDK 
> supported for 
> > the next major release 2.2 of Cocoon. Currently we are 
> supporting also 
> > 1.3 but seems like few people is using it.
> > 
> > Do you agree with JSDK 1.4 as the lower Java version 
> supported in Cocoon 2.2?
> > 
> > Here is my +1
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > 
> > Antonio Gallardo
> > 
> 

Reply via email to