Alan wrote:
* Ugo Cei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-03 08:15]:
Probably just the fact that we'd ship one less JAR file.
That was my point.

(Though a change would break sitemaps depending on ORO specific patterns,
    if there is such a thing.)

At the cost of breaking some sitemaps, and since it's more or less clear that we're going to require JDK 1.4 for 2.2, I'll probably propose to drop Jakarta ORO in favour of the JDK's package (unless it's seriously broken) ... travel light.


Ugo








Reply via email to