The XUL link bring a impressed application. But yes,90%(even more in my country) use IE,and it's almost impossible to persuade user throw IE away.But to developers or administrators it is different.Using Flash may offer great UI but still has some shortcoming: much slower compare standard html or XUL.So I +1 for flash rendering ,but my suggestion is why convert cocoon forms sample Form Model GUI to a complete XUL application enable developers and administrators to create cocoon form define,data binding and template?If it's a success application,many developers using cocoon may consider using XUL as special application UI or even more. WDYT? Roy Huang ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sylvain Wallez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 9:49 PM Subject: Re: [RT] - XUL revisited....
> Antonio Gallardo wrote: > > >Hi: > > > >I was revisiting the XUL website and found something great: > > > >http://mab.mozdev.org/ > > > >I am seriously thinking in XUL as the final code from forms block. I know XUL only > >works in Mozilla, but if we have the control of all the users machines, XUL can be > >the best choice. Think in a rich client without the fat of Java Applets. ;-) > > > > > > "if we have the control"... Unfortunately, 90% of people out there use IE... > > But a featureful XUL implementation of the CForms styling would > certainly help to convince people trashing IE and going for Mozilla! > > So +1 for a XUL styling. > > Sylvain > > -- > Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies > http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com > { XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects } > >
