:-) This translation is the right one. I'm always amazed to see that French is a foreign language for you and Marc, whose names sound so much more frenchy that many french people's name, including mine ;-)
Isn't Sylvain *the* French name? I only met two French men IRL, both were named Sylvain - if that's a criteria :) The one were you, the other one worked for Elf Aquitane near by here in Leuna.
This makes me think that we could even use <ft:widget> for repeaters instead of <ft:repeater-widget>. The word "repeater" doesn't bring much value IMO.
big +1
I often had the case were I copied stuff from the list view (= repeater) into the detail view (single elements) and had to rename the elements.
Note that I'd like also that <wi:styling> could be written in the definition also, as defining the styling in the widget definition can be a productivity boost with widget repositories!
Should be trivial to store this in the form definition.
Yep. But this brings some namespace-related questions: "styling" is obviously in the instance namespace ("fi"), but if we introduce some "fi:" in the definition, what about "label"? The CForms machinery does nothing with it except copying it in the template output, so we may consider moving it also to the "fi" namespace.
+1
Joerg
