Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote: > Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > > > This misery is probably partly my own (not being an SVN expert, and SVN has > > yet to mature) > > I'm going to take issue with this. :-) > > It's *mostly* due to the fact that Subclipse still needs a lot of work.
Me too. The command-line client is brilliant. And with the SVN Book so handy, what more could one want. --David
