Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 28.05.2004 02:33, Tony Collen wrote:
That's the other way around what I did. I committed the change to the doc when cleaning up my mails and having found http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=107543614600003&r=1&w=4. I also could not remember having used cocoon.continuation.id so I though he is correct. Did you test the above?
Ah, crap... I get -1000 for reading comprehension :P
:-)
Reverting....
Better try it out so that we can go sure.
Hmm, they both seem to work:
<p>cocoon.continuation.id: ${cocoon.continuation.id}</p>
<p>continuation.id: ${continuation.id}</p>yields:
<p xmlns:c="http://apache.org/cocoon/templates/jx/1.0";>cocoon.continuation.id: 542e3f295f3162016f200b848d47811573151082</p>
<p>continuation.id: 542e3f295f3162016f200b848d47811573151082</p>
But that does not explain why the tutorial wasn't working, unless cocoon.continuation.id was not supported back in January when the message was sent.
So which do we "recommend"?
Joerg
Tony
