On 28.05.2004 08:04, Tony Collen wrote:
Hmm, they both seem to work:
<p>cocoon.continuation.id: ${cocoon.continuation.id}</p> <p>continuation.id: ${continuation.id}</p>
yields:
<p xmlns:c="http://apache.org/cocoon/templates/jx/1.0";>cocoon.continuation.id: 542e3f295f3162016f200b848d47811573151082</p>
<p>continuation.id: 542e3f295f3162016f200b848d47811573151082</p>
But that does not explain why the tutorial wasn't working, unless cocoon.continuation.id was not supported back in January when the message was sent.
So which do we "recommend"?
n/m:
http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/userdocs/flow/jxtemplate.html
org.apache.cocoon.components.flow.WebContinuation continuation
The current Web Continuation (deprecated: use cocoon.continuation instead)
Guess cocoon.continuation is the preferred way.
The JXTemplateGenerator suggest to use ${continuation.id}, nothing about the cocoon prefix. Maybe we should ask Christopher what his plan was. Or we simply decide it here.
Joerg
