Nicola Ken Barozzi writes: > > Ugo Cei wrote: > > > Il giorno 30/lug/04, alle 00:24, Sylvain Wallez ha scritto: > > > >> Don't take all this badly Ugo: I see much more dangers in > turning the > >> sitemap into a scripting language than the advantages brought by > >> saving a few keystokes or the ease of implementation. But > I'm all for > >> a simplified implementation of the current syntax. > ... > > One thing I *hate* about flowscript is that it's in a different file > from the sitemap. Kinda like writing a java class with methods in one > file and fields in another. > > Having both in the same file, even if with a different language but > still with a readable format (like python), would be really cool.
<snip>example, rational</snip> Interesting idea. I take it you don't consider XML a readable format? It seems to me <script type="text/javascript"> shouldn't take much explaining to anyone who has reason to look at Cocoon....
