Il giorno 15/ott/04, alle 09:43, Niclas Hedhman ha scritto:
However, you are requesting that the Excalibur Source is a subclass of the
Cocoon Source. I suspect that is a typo, but if not, then you are introducing
a cross-dependency with the Excalibur project, or breaking namespace policies
by using the excalibur namespace.
Actually it was me who suggested that, not Carsten. It's not a typo. The plan is to move away from Excalibur, but keep the Source abstraction. In order to allow components importing o.a.excalibur.source to compile without mods, we could provide the subinterface I suggested *in* Cocoon. The original Excalibur source can remain as is, or it can go to the great jar in the sky, I don't care. The new Cocoon will have a new implementation of Source, SourceResolver, etc. which has nothing to do with Excalibur.
That's my plan, anyway,
Ugo
-- Ugo Cei - http://beblogging.com/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
