Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Saturday 16 October 2004 04:55, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Because they have been around forever *AND* they don't change their
contracts overnight.
Your talk is not entirely reflected by the actions of the community. I just did a svn up on the 2.1 branch;
A lib/endorsed/xalan-2.6.1-dev-20041008T0304.jar D lib/endorsed/xalan-2.6.0.jar
Why does the 2.1 branch require a timestamped/snapshot version of Xalan, if everything is so fine and dandy with it?
Damn, I am *NOT*. I missed that. We must not depend on timestamped jars for such important dependencies.
Antonio?
Antonio makes the following motivation in the commit message; "Update xalan to 2.6.1-dev-20041008T0304"
Yeah, that's useless. <shrug/>
-- Stefano.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
