Leszek Gawron wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Leszek Gawron wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
But the Dreamweaver usecase is a valid one (It was me who started a
discussion about this in May after attenting a Tapestry seminar at a
conference) and so we should support it.
Now, having them cohexist in the page smells like FS, though ;-)
Can't agree more.
What would you do then if you started simple (with attributes) and
found out after a while (when the template is already quite big) that
you need a tag syntax in some places?
Aren't they completly equivalent?
Yes they are (will/would be). Thing is you do not want them to coexist
in a single template.
Without a usecase where it makes really sense to support both ways, no.
(Think of the complaints about the two syntax for expression languages.)
--
Reinhard
