Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
On Jue, 9 de Diciembre de 2004, 2:49, Leszek Gawron dijo:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le 9 déc. 04, à 09:21, Leszek Gawron a écrit :
...By the way: it is a little bit different on win32. Some tools
detect utf encoding by checking for BOM. If there is none - ANSI
encoding is assumed...
AFAIU this is ok for 16-bit based encodings, not for UTF-8.
http://www.xencraft.com/resources/unicodebom.html
...
M$ again.
This is the standard:
http://www.zvon.org/tmRFC/RFC3023/Output/chapter8.html#sub1 :-D
No, it's not. The standard is:
http://www.w3c.org/TR/2004/REC-xml11-20040204/#NT-XMLDecl
XML *must* start with '<?xml'. So no MS junk of any kind is allowed.
Please don't use notepad - vim and far both have syntax highlight and do
not write boms of any kind :)
I am not using notepad :). Apparently even sophisticated win32 text
editors (like my favourive UltraEdit) support UTF-8 BOMs.
--
Leszek Gawron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project Manager MobileBox sp. z o.o.
+48 (61) 855 06 67 http://www.mobilebox.pl
mobile: +48 (501) 720 812 fax: +48 (61) 853 29 65
