On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 22:30:16 +0100, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think that's my point? If you want to sub in three things do it as > > normal String building and ignore the parameters substitution. Or use > > 2 parameters and one Java variable directly in the String... Nothing > > has gone away with UGLI, you just get some extra methods you can > > ignore if you want? > > ...and why would you want to go through the hassle and switch from > logkit then?
So you don't have to use logkit? (it wasn't my idea to switch)... > Where is the benefit of using UGLI then? -- Peter Hunsberger
