Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Why can't you write a log4j appender that talks to your system?
I'm not trying to be dense, I'm just trying to understand.
That would mean that I would be using log4j's configuration and filtering. If that was what I wanted I would just write my own log4j appenders. To feed it into my logging framework would mean two logging configurations (log4j's and mine) and double the path length. If I only wanted my framework's filtering it would mean that all logging "isEnabled" calls would have to return true to the application, so they could be filtered by my logging framework.
Not pretty.
Ralph
