If you prefer commons logging over it, please write a technical motivation about it.
As I already said: I don't see the point of this parameter stuff. IMO this only leads to mixing of concepts. Some people will use the "{}" some won't. To be honest I would not feel very happy with UGLI since IMHO this interface is only half-backed. Sorry.
...and I don't see point of getting rid of the Avalon Logger dependency and introducing the UGLI dependency instead. Only because we want to get rid of Avalon?
Is there any technical reason to switch from the Avalon Logger abstraction?
cheers -- Torsten
