oceatoon wrote:

do you mean input modules would be pluggable objects and we could create our
own object to be used ? but in that case why not simply create another IM?
And IM are quite usefull all over cocoon, don't you think?

IM are usefull, no doubt and yes it could be done with input modules. I just thought that instead of writing {im:some_path} (explicitly using the IM), just being able to use {some_path} would be nicer.

It's just a thought...

Carsten

Reply via email to