Daniel, On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:29:22 +0100, Daniel Fagerstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whithout migration part and/or extremely convincing usecases you will > find it rather hard to have any impact at Cocoon. Most of us have > invested so much effort in, and based on, the current architecture so we > need good reasons for introducing incompabillity.
Understood. I have also invested a lot of time in cocoon (full time for two years). I understand how you feel. Unfortunately, my aim was to get these ideas out there, and let people think about them. It would seem I didn't present them in a very palatable way. My initial reaction to your e-mail was one of disappointment and anger. I didn't spend weeks on this e-mail in an attempt to alienate myself from you guys, and that's what it feels like I've done. Contrary to what it would appear is the belief, I wrote the e-mail in an effort to /help/ the Cocoon project. I knew I couldn't just get in there and deliver all the changes myself, so I thought it was best to get them out on paper ASAP, and get other people excited and interested. Sorry it didn't work out that way. Paul
