Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > And I think nobody disagrees with that. Status page (suggested somewhere up > the > thread) indicating the status of the block, some additional information about > the block, etc, will accomplish this even with flat directory structure in > SVN. > > What exactly changing directory structure buys you? If there is clear and > structured documentation about the blocks (it can use structure like > supported/unsupported/contributed/abandoned/whatever) and similarly > structured > hierarchy in the sample webapp, what, on top of this, directory structure in > SVN > gives? > > I'm not so against moving stuff, but I'm just trying to understand why to > move. > Documenting the state is one thing, but imho just doing this in some descriptor isn't very visible. Who reads documentation or looks into a meta descriptor? :) So, by using a directory structure, it's immediately visible for everyone.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
