On Mie, 16 de Marzo de 2005, 10:17, Daniel Fagerstrom dijo: > Everything can be done in numerous ways. > > The directory structure is easy to understand, it is what we have > discussed at the list for quite a while, it is what Reinhard actually > have implemented and above all it moves us forward. > > There should of course be a metadata file for the block as well and > documentation generated from that. But AFAIK no one have started to work > on any such documentation functinonallity. So for the moment I think we > should focus on the *important* question: > > Which blocks do we support?
Well, this is a hard question. I read all the mails related to this topic and still I don't have a decision: 1-"The blocks used for my company will be supported by me". I guess every committer already did that. So I don't see here a problem, but..... 2-"Blocks not used by 'me', but are interesting or have big potential success". This is the hard question. How I can know if a block has potential success between people?. Even we know that cocoon has potential, but a lot of people don't use it. I hope this illustrate what I have in mind. In my case, in the first fill of the wiki Block poll, I added some blocks that I don't need for my work and never used it, but I found interesting and already worked on them just for fun. For example, qdox. In the second raid, I checked other blocks where I already worked outside my own interests, just for the community follwing some bugzilla reports and I hope I can use some time in the future to support in this way again. I know we have a problem, people wants to drops some blocks from his own POV. But perhaps this blocks are used by other people. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.
