Reinhard Poetz wrote:
This vote shows that at least one committer cares about the block (he calls for a vote) and he has to list good reasons why he thinks that it is stable (community, interfaces and implementation).
Of course we can group a several of votes into one voting process to avoid dozens of votings :-p
If you are speaking of current blocks, this is backwards. Our policy is to require comments only on -1 votes. Therefore, only blocks to be marked unstable would require justification.
What I meant was that the person calling for a vote has to list the reasons why he has the opinion that the status of a block has changed. If somebody starts a vote without explaining why a block has reached e.g. "supported", I would vote -1 and maybe I'm not the only one.
--
Reinhard Pötz Independant Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach
{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}web(log): http://www.poetz.cc --------------------------------------------------------------------
