On Apr 11, 2005 4:57 PM, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Reinhard Poetz wrote: > > > > I don't know why we named it "COB-INF" but there was (still is?) a good > > reason for this because I remember some long discussion. > > IIRC, reason was to avoid conflict with avalon/phoenix/somesuch > BLOCK-INF/block.xml, hence COB (Cocoon Block).
Yes. See [1] and [2] (first post got "orphaned" from the rest of the thread in the archive) Also, I assume you've seen [3]? - Geoff 1 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=106510643100003&r=1&w=2 2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=106510548208709&w=2 3 http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/BlocksFSLayout
